Comparison · Electronic loads
Atorch BW600 or BW150
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: BW150 (154.9 W vs. 150); Test current: Atorch BW600 (50 A vs. 25); Temperature rise: Atorch BW600 (90 °C vs. 90.8).
| Model |  Atorch BW6002025Read review → |  BW150Atorch · 2025Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 150 | 150 |
| In test, W | 150 | 154.9 |
| Test current, A | 50 | 25 |
| Temperature rise, °C | 90 | 90.8 |
| Review conclusion | With reservations | Recommended |
Only in one review: Current 30 A (Atorch BW600).
Atorch BW600: The load is capable and generally pleased the author, but has current overshoot with modules, control limitations, and other flaws.
BW150: BW150 is more convenient than the CL24 and recommended for batteries up to 12–24 V if 150 W is enough, despite retained limitations.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
