/    Measurement database » Power supplies » CTG-200W-12V or MP-U200S48
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

CTG-200W-12V or MP-U200S48

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: CTG-200W-12V (19.2 A vs. 5); Ripple: MP-U200S48 (100 mV vs. 160); Efficiency: MP-U200S48 (88.4 % vs. 86.5).

ModelCTG-200W-12VCTG-200W-12V2025Read review →MP-U200S48MP-U200S482023Read review →
Power, W200200
Test current, A19.25
Ripple, mV160100
Efficiency, %86.588.4
Review conclusionRecommendedRecommended

Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (CTG-200W-12V); Current 16.7 A (CTG-200W-12V); Under load 12.162 V (CTG-200W-12V); Protection 5.3 A (MP-U200S48); Temperature rise 118 °C (CTG-200W-12V).

CTG-200W-12V: Praised for its sound topology, overvoltage protection, and excellent regulation; the input capacitor is undersized.

MP-U200S48: A neatly built PSU with low ripple, though the author notes load-related voltage sag and odd behavior while cooling.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies