Comparison · Batteries

EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4 or Samsung ICR18650-26H

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4 (18190 mAh vs. 2319); Test current: EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4 (40 A vs. 5.2); Energy: EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4 (55.4 Wh vs. 7.5).

Model	EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO42023Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-26H2019Read review →
Capacity at high current, mAh	18190	2319
Test current, A	40	5.2
Energy, Wh	55.4	7.5
Review conclusion	With reservations	Not recommended

Only in one review: Capacity 2486 mAh (Samsung ICR18650-26H); Resistance 48 mΩ (Samsung ICR18650-26H); Temperature rise 60 °C (Samsung ICR18650-26H); Weight 357 g (EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4).

EVE 40135 20Ah LiFePO4: Capacity matches the rating, but there is internal movement and one cell delivered less capacity at 2C.

Samsung ICR18650-26H: The sample was judged counterfeit: capacity at 2C was below the original, and its contact and discharge curve differed.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.