RK8009 or RD6012(W)

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: RD6012(W) (738 W vs. 720); Efficiency: RK8009 (98.9 % vs. 98.4).

Model	RK8009Riden · 2026Read review →	RD6012(W)Rui Deng · 2020Read review →
Voltage, V	80	60
Current, A	9	12
Power, W	720	720
In test, W	720	738
Efficiency, %	98.9	98.4
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Ripple 200 mV (RD6012(W)); Temperature rise 60 °C (RD6012(W)); Price 101 $ (RD6012(W)).

RK8009: The converter showed low ripple, high efficiency, and little heating, but has limited headroom for minimum voltage drop.

RD6012(W): It works well and is highly efficient, but ripple is noticeably higher than on the RD6006.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Similar comparisons

← All: converters