Comparison · Converters

RK6006 or RBQ-8,2/45

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: RK6006 (325 W vs. 300); Test current: RBQ-8,2/45 (37.9 A vs. 6); Efficiency: RBQ-8,2/45 (98 % vs. 97.9).

Model	RK6006RuiDeng · 2023Read review →	RBQ-8,2/45Murata · 2018Read review →
Current, A	6	45
In test, W	325	300
Test current, A	6	37.9
Under load, V	55	8.163
Efficiency, %	97.9	98
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 8.2 V (RBQ-8,2/45); Ripple 100 mV (RK6006); No load 4 W (RBQ-8,2/45); Temperature rise 90 °C (RBQ-8,2/45); Price 3.12 $ (RBQ-8,2/45).

RK6006: The compact converter showed high accuracy, good dynamic performance, and low ripple; the author recommends it.

RBQ-8,2/45: A genuine converter with high efficiency and high output current; at room temperature it can deliver 15–16 A without extra cooling.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.