Comparison · Batteries

Vapcell F35 or LG INR18650-MJ1

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: These devices have no measurements in common that would show one is better than the other. Compare the review conclusions below.

Model	Vapcell F352023Read review →	LG INR18650-MJ12019Read review →
Capacity, mAh	3500	3500
Test current, A	10	10
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Current 10 A (LG INR18650-MJ1); Capacity at high current 3400 mAh (LG INR18650-MJ1); Energy 12.6 Wh (Vapcell F35); Resistance 27.7 mΩ (LG INR18650-MJ1); Temperature rise 80 °C (LG INR18650-MJ1).

Vapcell F35: The cells showed average capacity results, good consistency, and the claimed 12.6 Wh.

LG INR18650-MJ1: The cells delivered excellent capacity and handled a 10 A discharge well, but had higher resistance and heating.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.