/    Measurement database » Batteries » Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A or Samsung INR18650-35E
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A or Samsung INR18650-35E

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: Samsung INR18650-35E (3400 mAh vs. 3386).

ModelVapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10AVapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A2020Read review →Samsung INR18650-35ESamsung INR18650-35E2019Read review →
Current, A108
Capacity, mAh33863400
Test current, A1010
Review conclusionWith reservationsWith reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A); Capacity at high current 3329 mAh (Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A); Energy 10.53 Wh (Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A); Temperature rise 75 °C (Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A); Price 9.99 $ (Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A).

Vapcell F35 18650 3500mah 10A: This high-capacity cell meets its specifications but delivers less capacity than the LG INR18650-MJ1.

Samsung INR18650-35E: Real capacity at 0.2C is 3400 mAh; the author notes that the 35E also performs well.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries