Comparison · Batteries

VapCell IFR32700 G65 or Samsung INR18650-20S

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Resistance: VapCell IFR32700 G65 (6.5 mΩ vs. 7.5); Temperature rise: VapCell IFR32700 G65 (72 °C vs. 84).

Model	VapCell IFR32700 G652020Read review →	Samsung INR18650-20S2019Read review →
Current, A	30	30
Resistance, mΩ	6.5	7.5
Temperature rise, °C	72	84
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (VapCell IFR32700 G65); Test current 30 A (Samsung INR18650-20S); Energy 21.18 Wh (VapCell IFR32700 G65); Price 13.18 $ (VapCell IFR32700 G65).

VapCell IFR32700 G65: Capacity exceeded the rating, and the cells handled 30 A charging and discharging without problems.

Samsung INR18650-20S: At 30 A it reached only 84°C; the author notes it often costs less than the VTC4.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.