/    Measurement database » Power supplies » MeanWell PSC-160A-C or MeanWell PSC-160A-C
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

MeanWell PSC-160A-C or MeanWell PSC-160A-C

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: MeanWell PSC-160A-C (14.4 A vs. 10).

ModelMeanWell PSC-160A-CMeanWell PSC-160A-C2020Read review →MeanWell PSC-160A-CMeanWell PSC-160A-C2020Read review →
Power, W160160
Test current, A14.410
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 13.8 V (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); Current 7.6 A (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); In test 170 W (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); Ripple 270 mV (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); Efficiency 88 % (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); No load 2.4 W (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); Protection 9 A (MeanWell PSC-160A-C); Temperature rise 100 °C (MeanWell PSC-160A-C).

MeanWell PSC-160A-C: After modification, charge current fell to 1.3 A, noise was nearly eliminated, and output current increased substantially.

MeanWell PSC-160A-C: An efficient, well-built UPS, but it makes noise, runs hot, and has high ripple.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies