Comparison · Batteries

Panasonic NCR18650BD or Samsung INR18650-30Q

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: Samsung INR18650-30Q (3186 mAh vs. 3180); Test current: Samsung INR18650-30Q (20 A vs. 10).

Model	Panasonic NCR18650BD2019Read review →	Samsung INR18650-30Q2019Read review →
Current, A	6	15
Capacity, mAh	3180	3186
Test current, A	10	20
Review conclusion	With reservations	Recommended

Only in one review: Resistance 12.9 mΩ (Samsung INR18650-30Q); Temperature rise 92 °C (Samsung INR18650-30Q).

Panasonic NCR18650BD: The first cell delivered 3180 mAh at 0.2C; the second reached almost 3250 mAh when charged to 4.2 V.

Samsung INR18650-30Q: Quality cells meet their stated specifications, and the author unequivocally recommends buying them.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

Panasonic NCR18650BD or Murata VTC6 Panasonic NCR18650BD or LG INR18650-MH1 Samsung INR18650-30Q or Panasonic NCR18650B with protection Samsung INR18650-30Q or Murata VTC6

← All: batteries

« November 2026 »
Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
						1
2	3	4	5	6	7	8
9	10	11	12	13	14	15
16	17	18	19	20	21	22
23	24	25	26	27	28	29
30