Comparison · Electronic loads
EBC-A10H or 150 W electronic load kit
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: 150 W electronic load kit (160 W vs. 150); Test current: EBC-A10H (10 A vs. 5); Temperature rise: EBC-A10H (90 °C vs. 110); Price: 150 W electronic load kit (4.9 $ vs. 65).
| Model |  EBC-A10HZKEtech · 2019Read review → |  150 W electronic load kit2018Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 150 | 150 |
| In test, W | 150 | 160 |
| Test current, A | 10 | 5 |
| Temperature rise, °C | 90 | 110 |
| Price, $ | 65 | 4.9 |
| Review conclusion | Recommended | Recommended |
Only in one review: Voltage 15 V (150 W electronic load kit); Current 10 A (150 W electronic load kit).
EBC-A10H: The author liked the load: its power limit rose to 150 W, but the charger remains weak.
150 W electronic load kit: An inexpensive, easy-to-assemble kit handled 160 W briefly, but the author recommends keeping continuous power at or below 120 W.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
