/    Measurement database » Batteries » QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or Samsung ICR18650-32A
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or Samsung ICR18650-32A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP (40 A vs. 5).

ModelQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFPQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP2026Read review →Samsung ICR18650-32ASamsung ICR18650-32A2016Read review →
Voltage, V3.24.35
Test current, A405
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP: Good cells with honest capacity, good thermal behavior, and fast charging.

Samsung ICR18650-32A: Capacity presented no problems, but protection can fail when discharge ends and charging begins.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

← All: batteries