/    Measurement database » Power supplies » LS-300W-24V or CTG-300W-12V
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

LS-300W-24V or CTG-300W-12V

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: CTG-300W-12V (21.5 A vs. 16); Ripple: LS-300W-24V (180 mV vs. 300).

ModelLS-300W-24VLS-300W-24V2025Read review →CTG-300W-12VCTG-300W-12V2025Read review →
Voltage, V2412
Current, A12.525
Power, W300300
Test current, A1621.5
Ripple, mV180300
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: In test 380 W (LS-300W-24V); Under load 12.216 V (CTG-300W-12V); Efficiency 93.2 % (LS-300W-24V); Protection 17.4 A (LS-300W-24V); Temperature rise 105 °C (CTG-300W-12V).

LS-300W-24V: The PSU handles overload well, with high efficiency and low ripple, but its protection trip threshold is too high.

CTG-300W-12V: It is effectively suited to about 230–250 W; the small input capacitor and higher ripple detract from it.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies