/    Measurement database » Batteries » HAKADI 26700 3500mAh or Samsung INR18650-30Q
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

HAKADI 26700 3500mAh or Samsung INR18650-30Q

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: HAKADI 26700 3500mAh (3095 mAh vs. 2940); Price: Samsung INR18650-30Q (8.92 $ vs. 16).

ModelHAKADI 26700 3500mAhHAKADI 26700 3500mAh2024Read review →Samsung INR18650-30QSamsung INR18650-30Q2016Read review →
Voltage, V3.13.7
Capacity, mAh30952940
Price, $168.92
Review conclusionWith reservationsRecommended

Only in one review: Test current 15 A (Samsung INR18650-30Q).

HAKADI 26700 3500mAh: Capacity fell short of the rating, but the author notes good cold-weather performance and tolerance of over-discharge.

Samsung INR18650-30Q: At a 3 A discharge, capacity was about 2940 mAh, matching the stated figures.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

HAKADI 26700 3500mAh or Vapcell F32HAKADI 26700 3500mAh or Panasonic NCR18650BSamsung INR18650-30Q or LG INR18650-HG2LSamsung INR18650-30Q or Liitokala NCR18650BSamsung INR18650-30Q or LG INR18650-HG2L

← All: batteries



RegisterLog in
UAУкраїнськаENEnglishPLPolski中文ESEspañolPTPortuguêsDEDeutschRUРусский
or