/    Measurement database » Converters » RK8009 or WZ5005
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Converters

RK8009 or WZ5005

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: RK8009 (9 A vs. 5); Ripple: RK8009 (50 mV vs. 80); Efficiency: RK8009 (98.9 % vs. 97.4).

ModelRK8009RK8009Riden · 2026Read review →WZ5005WZ50052020Read review →
Test current, A95
Ripple, mV5080
Efficiency, %98.997.4
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 80 V (RK8009); Current 9 A (RK8009); Power 720 W (RK8009); Under load 81 V (RK8009); Temperature rise 54 °C (WZ5005).

RK8009: The converter showed low ripple, high efficiency and good thermal performance; its main drawback is limited input-voltage headroom.

WZ5005: Good efficiency and low ripple, but the converter is underdeveloped, with dangerous voltage spikes and other issues.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: converters