Comparison · Chargers
Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or Modiary MDA238 42V 2A
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (5.5 A vs. 1.9); Temperature rise: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (76 °C vs. 100).
| Model |  Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review → |  Modiary MDA238 42V 2A2020Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 160 | 85 |
| Test current, A | 5.5 | 1.9 |
| Temperature rise, °C | 76 | 100 |
| Review conclusion | — | Recommended |
Only in one review: Voltage 42 V (Modiary MDA238 42V 2A); Current 2 A (Modiary MDA238 42V 2A); In test 110 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Weight 55 g (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX).
Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols but enters thermal protection after 7–8 minutes under high load; sustained 160 W is unavailable.
Modiary MDA238 42V 2A: A well-built charger with auto-shutoff and protection, but it sometimes fails to stop charging after reconnection.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
