/    Measurement database » Chargers » Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or Choetech Q6006
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Chargers

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or Choetech Q6006

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (110 W vs. 67); Temperature rise: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (76 °C vs. 79).

ModelBaseus 160W CCZX-160CXBaseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review →Choetech Q6006Choetech Q60062020Read review →
In test, W11067
Temperature rise, °C7679
Review conclusion—With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 20.3 V (Choetech Q6006); Current 3 A (Choetech Q6006); Power 61 W (Choetech Q6006); Ripple 140 mV (Choetech Q6006); Efficiency 91 % (Choetech Q6006); No load 0.4 W (Choetech Q6006); Price 20 $ (Choetech Q6006).

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols, but sustains its rated power only briefly and overheats.

Choetech Q6006: A compact charger with quality components and stable operation, but limited protocol support.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: chargers