Comparison · Chargers

Choetech Q6006 or CHOETECH Q4004

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: CHOETECH Q4004 (70 W vs. 67); Ripple: Choetech Q6006 (140 mV vs. 200); Efficiency: Choetech Q6006 (91 % vs. 90); Temperature rise: Choetech Q6006 (79 °C vs. 100).

Model	Choetech Q60062020Read review →	CHOETECH Q40042020Read review →
Voltage, V	20.3	60
Power, W	61	60
In test, W	67	70
Ripple, mV	140	200
Efficiency, %	91	90
Temperature rise, °C	79	100
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Current 3 A (Choetech Q6006); No load 0.4 W (Choetech Q6006); Price 20 $ (Choetech Q6006).

Choetech Q6006: A compact charger with quality components and stable operation, but limited protocol support.

CHOETECH Q4004: It stably delivers the rated 60 W and up to 70 W, but runs hot with little thermal headroom at maximum power.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.