Comparison · Chargers

Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C or QC 3.0 charger

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C (40.1 W vs. 25); Ripple: Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C (70 mV vs. 200).

Model	Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C2023Read review →	QC 3.0 charger2018Read review →
Power, W	30	19.2
In test, W	40.1	25
Ripple, mV	70	200
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (QC 3.0 charger); Current 3 A (QC 3.0 charger); Temperature rise 115 °C (QC 3.0 charger); Price 16 $ (Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C).

Baseus CCCP30UE 2A1C: It supports many protocols and delivers up to 40.1 W, but overheats under load and the author considers it expensive.

QC 3.0 charger: It regulates voltage well and delivers its rated current, but overheats and has elevated ripple at 5 V.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.