Comparison · Converters

RK6006 or DPH5005

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: RK6006 (325 W vs. 250); Test current: RK6006 (6 A vs. 5); Efficiency: RK6006 (97.9 % vs. 94.7).

Model	RK6006RuiDeng · 2023Read review →	DPH5005RuiDeng · 2018Read review →
Current, A	6	5.1
In test, W	325	250
Test current, A	6	5
Ripple, mV	100	100
Efficiency, %	97.9	94.7
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 50 V (DPH5005); Power 250 W (DPH5005); Under load 55 V (RK6006); Temperature rise 56 °C (DPH5005); Price 42.94 $ (DPH5005).

RK6006: The compact converter showed high accuracy, good dynamic performance, and low ripple; the author recommends it.

DPH5005: The converter showed good calibration, low heating and ripple up to the specified 100 mV, but input current is limited to 10 A.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.