Comparison · Batteries

Vapcell INR18500 N24 or Samsung ICR18650-26F

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: Samsung ICR18650-26F (2446 mAh vs. 2320); Test current: Samsung ICR18650-26F (5.2 A vs. 5); Temperature rise: Samsung ICR18650-26F (53 °C vs. 60).

Model	Vapcell INR18500 N242023Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-26F2019Read review →
Current, A	5	5.2
Capacity, mAh	2320	2446
Test current, A	5	5.2
Temperature rise, °C	60	53
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (Vapcell INR18500 N24); Energy 8.33 Wh (Vapcell INR18500 N24).

Vapcell INR18500 N24: The cells nearly meet their stated specifications, but measured results vary noticeably.

Samsung ICR18650-26F: This budget cell is noticeably worn; it suits low-current use, but the author suggests looking for a better model.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.