Comparison · Converters

XYH3606 or RBQ-8,2/45

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: RBQ-8,2/45 (300 W vs. 215); Test current: RBQ-8,2/45 (37.9 A vs. 6); Efficiency: RBQ-8,2/45 (98 % vs. 94.8); No load: XYH3606 (2 W vs. 4); Temperature rise: RBQ-8,2/45 (90 °C vs. 120); Price: RBQ-8,2/45 (3.12 $ vs. 32.3).

Model	XYH36062021Read review →	RBQ-8,2/45Murata · 2018Read review →
Voltage, V	36.5	8.2
Current, A	6.1	45
In test, W	215	300
Test current, A	6	37.9
Efficiency, %	94.8	98
No load, W	2	4
Temperature rise, °C	120	90
Price, $	32.3	3.12
Review conclusion	With reservations	Recommended

Only in one review: Power 216 W (XYH3606); Under load 8.163 V (RBQ-8,2/45).

XYH3606: A powerful, feature-rich converter with decent efficiency, but CC-mode behavior, ripple and Wi-Fi problems detract from it.

RBQ-8,2/45: A genuine converter with high efficiency and high output current; at room temperature it can deliver 15–16 A without extra cooling.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.