Comparison · Batteries

Vapcell F32 or Samsung ICR18650-32A protected

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: Samsung ICR18650-32A protected (3094 mAh vs. 3060); Capacity at high current: Vapcell F32 (3096 mAh vs. 3023); Test current: Vapcell F32 (10 A vs. 5.1); Temperature rise: Samsung ICR18650-32A protected (71.5 °C vs. 74).

Model	Vapcell F322021Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-32A protected2016Read review →
Capacity, mAh	3060	3094
Capacity at high current, mAh	3096	3023
Test current, A	10	5.1
Temperature rise, °C	74	71.5
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (Vapcell F32); Current 10 A (Vapcell F32); Energy 11.33 Wh (Vapcell F32); Weight 51.8 g (Samsung ICR18650-32A protected); Price 14.99 $ (Vapcell F32).

Vapcell F32: The F32 cells handle the rated 10 A well and are consistent, but capacity is only around the stated minimum.

Samsung ICR18650-32A protected: Capacity and internal resistance are close to spec, but the cell overheats at about 1.5–2C discharge and protection cannot handle charging to 4.35 V.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.