Comparison · Batteries

Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A or Samsung ICR18650-22P

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: Samsung ICR18650-22P (1995 mAh vs. 1985); Energy: Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A (7.368 Wh vs. 7.2); Resistance: Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A (7.7 mΩ vs. 20).

Model	Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A2021Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-22P2019Read review →
Capacity, mAh	1985	1995
Energy, Wh	7.368	7.2
Resistance, mΩ	7.7	20
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A); Current 38 A (Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A); Capacity at high current 1857 mAh (Samsung ICR18650-22P); Test current 38 A (Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A); Temperature rise 77.5 °C (Samsung ICR18650-22P); Weight 45.24 g (Samsung ICR18650-22P).

Vapcell INR18650 2000mAh 38A: Good cells with near-ideal results, but the price is greatly inflated.

Samsung ICR18650-22P: The cell seems close to genuine, but its condition and storage are concerning, so the author advises against buying such cells.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.