Comparison · Batteries

VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh or Samsung ICR18650-22P

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (2123 mAh vs. 1995); Energy: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (7.64 Wh vs. 7.2); Resistance: Samsung ICR18650-22P (20 mΩ vs. 35); Temperature rise: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (64 °C vs. 77.5).

Model	VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh2020Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-22P2019Read review →
Capacity, mAh	2123	1995
Energy, Wh	7.64	7.2
Resistance, mΩ	35	20
Temperature rise, °C	64	77.5
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh); Current 6 A (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh); Capacity at high current 1857 mAh (Samsung ICR18650-22P); Test current 8 A (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh); Weight 45.24 g (Samsung ICR18650-22P); Price 10.98 $ (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh).

VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh: The stated specifications were confirmed, but the two cells differed noticeably when discharged at 8 A.

Samsung ICR18650-22P: The cell seems close to genuine, but its condition and storage are concerning, so the author advises against buying such cells.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.