Comparison · Batteries

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah or VapCell IFR10370 140mAh

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (90 A vs. 2); Resistance: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (0.28 mΩ vs. 90).

Model	LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah2021Read review →	VapCell IFR10370 140mAh2020Read review →
Current, A	270	1
Test current, A	90	2
Resistance, mΩ	0.28	90
Weight, g	2000	7
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (VapCell IFR10370 140mAh); Capacity 120 mAh (VapCell IFR10370 140mAh); Capacity at high current 92950 mAh (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Energy 288.02 Wh (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Temperature rise 45 °C (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Price 5 $ (VapCell IFR10370 140mAh).

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah: The cells exceeded rated capacity, had low impedance, and performed well at up to 90 A; voltage sag was pronounced in the freezer.

VapCell IFR10370 140mAh: They broadly meet the specifications, but the two cells show noticeable variation.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.