Comparison · Batteries

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah or Soshine IFR Lifepo4 Rechargeable Battery CR123 / 16340

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity at high current: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (92950 mAh vs. 342); Test current: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (90 A vs. 10); Energy: LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah (288.02 Wh vs. 1.209).

Model	LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah2021Read review →	Soshine IFR Lifepo4 Rechargeable Battery CR123 / 163402018Read review →
Current, A	270	1.5
Capacity at high current, mAh	92950	342
Test current, A	90	10
Energy, Wh	288.02	1.209
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (Soshine IFR Lifepo4 Rechargeable Battery CR123 / 16340); Capacity 396 mAh (Soshine IFR Lifepo4 Rechargeable Battery CR123 / 16340); Resistance 0.28 mΩ (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Temperature rise 45 °C (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah); Weight 2000 g (LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah).

LiFePO4 EVE Energy 3.2V 90Ah: The cells exceeded rated capacity, had low impedance, and performed well at up to 90 A; voltage sag was pronounced in the freezer.

Soshine IFR Lifepo4 Rechargeable Battery CR123 / 16340: Capacity is about 20% below expectation, but the CR123 cell withstood a 7 A discharge.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.