Comparison · Converters

G1208-20013120A or ZC826

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: G1208-20013120A (30 A vs. 4.2); Ripple: G1208-20013120A (35 mV vs. 700).

Model	G1208-20013120A2020Read review →	ZC826YZXstudio · 2019Read review →
Test current, A	30	4.2
Ripple, mV	35	700
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 20 V (ZC826); Current 3 A (ZC826); Power 60 W (ZC826); In test 80 W (ZC826); No load 1.2 W (G1208-20013120A); Protection 4.2 A (ZC826); Price 21.5 $ (ZC826).

G1208-20013120A: The author liked this compact dual-channel converter for its stability, power, decent efficiency, and protections.

ZC826: A powerful, well-made board with broad protocol support and bidirectional operation, but it is expensive.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.