/    Measurement database » Batteries » VapCell IFR32700 G65 or Murata US18650VTC4
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

VapCell IFR32700 G65 or Murata US18650VTC4

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Temperature rise: VapCell IFR32700 G65 (72 °C vs. 108).

ModelVapCell IFR32700 G65VapCell IFR32700 G652020Read review →Murata US18650VTC4Murata US18650VTC42019Read review →
Current, A3030
Temperature rise, °C72108
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (VapCell IFR32700 G65); Test current 30 A (Murata US18650VTC4); Energy 21.18 Wh (VapCell IFR32700 G65); Resistance 6.5 mΩ (VapCell IFR32700 G65); Price 13.18 $ (VapCell IFR32700 G65).

VapCell IFR32700 G65: Capacity exceeded the rating, and the cells handled 30 A charging and discharging without problems.

Murata US18650VTC4: An older roughly 2000 mAh cell; in the 30 A test, the second cell reached almost 108°C.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries