/    Measurement database » Power supplies » QS-18-12 or HDR-15-24
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

QS-18-12 or HDR-15-24

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Ripple: HDR-15-24 (50 mV vs. 350); Efficiency: HDR-15-24 (87 % vs. 85); Temperature rise: HDR-15-24 (81.5 °C vs. 93).

ModelQS-18-12QS-18-122026Read review →HDR-15-24HDR-15-24MeanWell · 2021Read review →
Power, W1815
Ripple, mV35050
Efficiency, %8587
Temperature rise, °C9381.5
Review conclusionRecommendedRecommended

Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (QS-18-12); Current 1.5 A (QS-18-12); No load 0.1 W (QS-18-12).

QS-18-12: A decent supply, but the author recommends keeping continuous load to 15 W.

HDR-15-24: The supply showed good regulation and low ripple; the author was pleased with its quality despite finding debris inside.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies