/    Measurement database » Power supplies » QS-18-12 or GFA20A-12
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

QS-18-12 or GFA20A-12

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Ripple: GFA20A-12 (35 mV vs. 350); No load: QS-18-12 (0.1 W vs. 0.2); Temperature rise: GFA20A-12 (70 °C vs. 93).

ModelQS-18-12QS-18-122026Read review →GFA20A-12GFA20A-12SANMIM · 2019Read review →
Voltage, V1212
Current, A1.51.7
Power, W1820
Ripple, mV35035
No load, W0.10.2
Temperature rise, °C9370
Review conclusionRecommendedRecommended

Only in one review: In test 37 W (GFA20A-12); Efficiency 85 % (QS-18-12); Price 6.5 $ (GFA20A-12).

QS-18-12: A decent supply, but the author recommends keeping continuous load to 15 W.

GFA20A-12: The power supply showed ample power headroom, low heat and low ripple; the author recommends it.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies