Samsung INR21700-50E or LG INR21700-M50T

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: LG INR21700-M50T (4969 mAh vs. 4900); Test current: Samsung INR21700-50E (14.7 A vs. 14.55).

Model	Samsung INR21700-50E2019Read review →	LG INR21700-M50T2019Read review →
Current, A	10	7.3
Capacity, mAh	4900	4969
Test current, A	14.7	14.55
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Energy 18.12 Wh (LG INR21700-M50T); Temperature rise 89 °C (LG INR21700-M50T).

Samsung INR21700-50E: Real capacity is just over 4900 mAh; above 10 A it outperforms the LG M50T.

LG INR21700-M50T: The cells show good consistency and perform better at low currents, but lag behind Samsung at high currents.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries