/    Measurement database » Batteries » QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or JGNE 18650 1800mAh
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or JGNE 18650 1800mAh

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP (40 A vs. 10).

ModelQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFPQNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP2026Read review →JGNE 18650 1800mAhJGNE 18650 1800mAh2020Read review →
Voltage, V3.23.2
Test current, A4010
Review conclusionRecommendedWith reservations

Only in one review: Weight 42 g (JGNE 18650 1800mAh).

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP: Good cells with honest capacity, good thermal behavior, and fast charging.

JGNE 18650 1800mAh: The cell delivered nearly 1800 mAh and performed better at high currents, but loses more capacity in the cold than the 1600 mAh model.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries