Comparison · Batteries

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP or VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP (40 A vs. 7).

Model	QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP2026Read review →	VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L222020Read review →
Voltage, V	3.2	3.6
Test current, A	40	7
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Current 4 A (VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22); Capacity 2200 mAh (VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22); Energy 7.926 Wh (VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22); Temperature rise 80 °C (VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22); Price 13.18 $ (VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22).

QNAS 40160 25Ah 3.2V LFP: Good cells with honest capacity, good thermal behavior, and fast charging.

VapCell INR18500 2200mah 4A L22: Capacity and load current meet expectations, but the author considers the price too high.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.