Comparison · Electronic loads
CL24 electronic load in enclosure or EBC-A40L
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: CL24 electronic load in enclosure (380 W vs. 110); Test current: EBC-A40L (40 A vs. 25).
| Model |  CL24 electronic load in enclosure2025Read review → |  EBC-A40LZKEtech · 2020Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Current, A | 25 | 40 |
| Power, W | 400 | 200 |
| In test, W | 380 | 110 |
| Test current, A | 25 | 40 |
| Review conclusion | Recommended | Recommended |
Only in one review: Voltage 5 V (EBC-A40L); Temperature rise 65 °C (EBC-A40L); Weight 5400 g (EBC-A40L); Price 140 $ (EBC-A40L).
CL24 electronic load in enclosure: The author built two enclosed CL24 loads; they sustain 350 W continuously and are rated for up to 25 A.
EBC-A40L: The load works very well and meets its specifications, but has several design shortcomings.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
