Comparison · Electronic loads
EBC-A40L or 150 W electronic load kit
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: 150 W electronic load kit (160 W vs. 110); Test current: EBC-A40L (40 A vs. 5); Temperature rise: EBC-A40L (65 °C vs. 110); Price: 150 W electronic load kit (4.9 $ vs. 140).
| Model |  EBC-A40LZKEtech · 2020Read review → |  150 W electronic load kit2018Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Voltage, V | 5 | 15 |
| Current, A | 40 | 10 |
| Power, W | 200 | 150 |
| In test, W | 110 | 160 |
| Test current, A | 40 | 5 |
| Temperature rise, °C | 65 | 110 |
| Price, $ | 140 | 4.9 |
| Review conclusion | Recommended | Recommended |
Only in one review: Weight 5400 g (EBC-A40L).
EBC-A40L: The load works very well and meets its specifications, but has several design shortcomings.
150 W electronic load kit: An inexpensive, easy-to-assemble kit handled 160 W briefly, but the author recommends keeping continuous power at or below 120 W.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
