Comparison · Converters

RK8009 or RD6024

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: RD6024 (24.1 A vs. 9); Ripple: RK8009 (50 mV vs. 150); Efficiency: RK8009 (98.9 % vs. 97.1).

Model	RK8009Riden · 2026Read review →	RD6024RuiDeng · 2022Read review →
Test current, A	9	24.1
Ripple, mV	50	150
Efficiency, %	98.9	97.1
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 80 V (RK8009); Current 9 A (RK8009); Power 720 W (RK8009); Under load 81 V (RK8009).

RK8009: The converter showed low ripple, high efficiency and good thermal performance; its main drawback is limited input-voltage headroom.

RD6024: A good alternative to the RD6012 and RD6018, delivering up to 24 A with good ripple and accuracy, but no four-wire connection.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.