Comparison · Chargers

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or FL-4H-LCD-D

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (5.5 A vs. 1); Temperature rise: FL-4H-LCD-D (58 °C vs. 76).

Model	Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review →	FL-4H-LCD-D2015Read review →
Test current, A	5.5	1
Temperature rise, °C	76	58
Review conclusion	—	Recommended

Only in one review: Current 1 A (FL-4H-LCD-D); Power 160 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); In test 110 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Weight 55 g (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX).

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols but enters thermal protection after 7–8 minutes under high load; sustained 160 W is unavailable.

FL-4H-LCD-D: The charger gives fairly plausible capacity readings and is well built, but it gets very hot during discharge.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.