Comparison · Chargers
Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board (14.3 A vs. 5.5).
| Model |  Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review → |  Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board2024Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 160 | 200 |
| Test current, A | 5.5 | 14.3 |
| Review conclusion | — | Recommended |
Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board); In test 110 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Under load 14.2 V (Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board); Temperature rise 76 °C (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Weight 55 g (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX).
Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols but enters thermal protection after 7–8 minutes under high load; sustained 160 W is unavailable.
Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board: The modified charger ends charging more correctly by lowering the voltage and effectively stopping the charge.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
