Comparison · Chargers
ZC823 v13 (ZC823P) or Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board (14.3 A vs. 5).
| Model |  ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)YZXstudio · 2019Read review → |  Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board2024Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Power, W | 100 | 200 |
| Test current, A | 5 | 14.3 |
| Review conclusion | With reservations | Recommended |
Only in one review: Voltage 12 V (Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board); Under load 14.2 V (Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board); Ripple 65 mV (ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)); Protection 3.1 A (ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)).
ZC823 v13 (ZC823P): The board supports several protocols, but the author could not get the claimed 100 W; the usual maximum was 3.1 A.
Meanwell LRS-200-12 with adapter board: The modified charger ends charging more correctly by lowering the voltage and effectively stopping the charge.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
