Comparison · Chargers

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX or ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX (5.5 A vs. 5).

Model	Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX2023Read review →	ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)YZXstudio · 2019Read review →
Power, W	160	100
Test current, A	5.5	5
Review conclusion	—	With reservations

Only in one review: In test 110 W (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Ripple 65 mV (ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)); Protection 3.1 A (ZC823 v13 (ZC823P)); Temperature rise 76 °C (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX); Weight 55 g (Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX).

Baseus 160W CCZX-160CX: It supports many protocols but enters thermal protection after 7–8 minutes under high load; sustained 160 W is unavailable.

ZC823 v13 (ZC823P): The board supports several protocols, but the author could not get the claimed 100 W; the usual maximum was 3.1 A.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.