Comparison · Batteries

CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah or LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (52948 mAh vs. 26290); Test current: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (90 A vs. 40).

Model	CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah2021Read review →	LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah2021Read review →
Capacity, mAh	52948	26290
Test current, A	90	40
Review conclusion	With reservations	Not recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 3.7 V (CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah); Current 25 A (CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah); Capacity at high current 52948 mAh (CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah); Energy 200 Wh (CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah); Resistance 1 mΩ (LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah); Temperature rise 42 °C (LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah); Weight 602 g (LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah); Price 17.11 $ (LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah).

CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah: The cells delivered over 52 Ah even at a 90 A discharge, but became slightly thicker after testing.

LiitoKala LiFePO4 30 Ah: All four cells fall short on capacity; the third sags more under load and self-discharges faster.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.