Comparison · Batteries

CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah or 66160 LTO battery cell

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (52948 mAh vs. 27500); Capacity at high current: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (52948 mAh vs. 17300); Test current: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (90 A vs. 40); Energy: CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah (200 Wh vs. 58).

Model	CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah2021Read review →	66160 LTO battery cell2021Read review →
Voltage, V	3.7	2.3
Current, A	25	300
Capacity, mAh	52948	27500
Capacity at high current, mAh	52948	17300
Test current, A	90	40
Energy, Wh	200	58
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Resistance 1.33 mΩ (66160 LTO battery cell); Temperature rise 34 °C (66160 LTO battery cell).

CATL LiNiCoMnO2 3.7V 50Ah: The cells delivered over 52 Ah even at a 90 A discharge, but became slightly thicker after testing.

66160 LTO battery cell: After being stored discharged, the cell still works, but its capacity drops sharply as load current rises.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.