Comparison · Batteries

66160 LTO battery cell or Liitokala LiFePO4 32 Ah cell

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: 66160 LTO battery cell (27500 mAh vs. 24420); Capacity at high current: Liitokala LiFePO4 32 Ah cell (24300 mAh vs. 17300).

Model	66160 LTO battery cell2021Read review →	Liitokala LiFePO4 32 Ah cell2020Read review →
Voltage, V	2.3	3.2
Capacity, mAh	27500	24420
Capacity at high current, mAh	17300	24300
Test current, A	40	40
Review conclusion	With reservations	With reservations

Only in one review: Current 300 A (66160 LTO battery cell); Energy 58 Wh (66160 LTO battery cell); Resistance 1.33 mΩ (66160 LTO battery cell); Temperature rise 34 °C (66160 LTO battery cell); Price 20.3 $ (Liitokala LiFePO4 32 Ah cell).

66160 LTO battery cell: After being stored discharged, the cell still works, but its capacity drops sharply as load current rises.

Liitokala LiFePO4 32 Ah cell: Handles loads up to 40 A well, but capacity is about 24 Ah rather than the claimed 32 Ah; the welded tabs are questionable.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.