/    Measurement database » Batteries » VapCell IFR10370 140mAh or VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Batteries

VapCell IFR10370 140mAh or VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A (2600 mAh vs. 120); Test current: VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A (40 A vs. 2); Resistance: VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A (4.5 mΩ vs. 90); Price: VapCell IFR10370 140mAh (5 $ vs. 16.49).

ModelVapCell IFR10370 140mAhVapCell IFR10370 140mAh2020Read review →VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75AVapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A2020Read review →
Voltage, V3.23.2
Current, A155
Capacity, mAh1202600
Test current, A240
Resistance, mΩ904.5
Weight, g786
Price, $516.49
Review conclusionWith reservationsRecommended

Only in one review: Capacity at high current 2500 mAh (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A).

VapCell IFR10370 140mAh: They broadly meet the specifications, but the two cells show noticeable variation.

VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A: The cells delivered 40 A and over 2500 mAh at 20–40 A, with low resistance; the author's only complaint is the price.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: batteries