Comparison · Batteries

VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A or Samsung ICR18650-26H

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A (2600 mAh vs. 2582); Test current: VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A (40 A vs. 5.2).

Model	VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A2020Read review →	Samsung ICR18650-26H2019Read review →
Current, A	55	5.2
Capacity, mAh	2600	2582
Test current, A	40	5.2
Review conclusion	Recommended	With reservations

Only in one review: Voltage 3.2 V (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Capacity at high current 2500 mAh (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Resistance 4.5 mΩ (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Temperature rise 45 °C (Samsung ICR18650-26H); Weight 86 g (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A); Price 16.49 $ (VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A).

VapCell IFR26650 2600mah 3.2V 55A/75A: The cells delivered 40 A and over 2500 mAh at 20–40 A, with low resistance; the author's only complaint is the price.

Samsung ICR18650-26H: It measured 2,582 mAh and ran cooler, but the author considers it a budget option for moderate loads.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.