Comparison · Batteries

VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh or Samsung INR 18650-20S

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Capacity: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (2123 mAh vs. 2021); Test current: Samsung INR 18650-20S (30 A vs. 8); Energy: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (7.64 Wh vs. 6.815); Resistance: Samsung INR 18650-20S (7 mΩ vs. 35); Temperature rise: VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh (64 °C vs. 84).

Model	VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh2020Read review →	Samsung INR 18650-20S2019Read review →
Capacity, mAh	2123	2021
Test current, A	8	30
Energy, Wh	7.64	6.815
Resistance, mΩ	35	7
Temperature rise, °C	64	84
Review conclusion	Recommended	Recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 3.6 V (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh); Current 6 A (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh); Capacity at high current 1990 mAh (Samsung INR 18650-20S); Price 10.98 $ (VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh).

VapCell INR26350 A20 2000mAh: The stated specifications were confirmed, but the two cells differed noticeably when discharged at 8 A.

Samsung INR 18650-20S: The high-current cell delivered well with modest heating, and the author unequivocally recommends it.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.