Comparison · Power supplies

NVVV S-800-70 or GOPHERT CPS-6011

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: NVVV S-800-70 (11.5 A vs. 10.5); Temperature rise: GOPHERT CPS-6011 (35 °C vs. 230).

Model	NVVV S-800-702020Read review →	GOPHERT CPS-60112016Read review →
Voltage, V	70	60
Current, A	11.4	11
Power, W	800	700
Test current, A	11.5	10.5
Under load, V	57.13	50
Temperature rise, °C	230	35
Review conclusion	With reservations	Recommended

Only in one review: In test 657 W (NVVV S-800-70); Ripple 500 mV (NVVV S-800-70); Efficiency 87 % (NVVV S-800-70); No load 6 W (NVVV S-800-70); Protection 11.5 A (NVVV S-800-70); Price 151 $ (GOPHERT CPS-6011).

NVVV S-800-70: A decent, stable power supply, but it needs modification because of overheating resistors and a noisy fan.

GOPHERT CPS-6011: The author liked it for its regulation and build quality, despite stiff buttons and active cooling.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.