Comparison · Electronic loads
EBC-A40L or Electronic load 150 V, 40 A, 300 W
Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.
In brief: Based on review measurements: In test: Electronic load 150 V, 40 A, 300 W (300 W vs. 110).
| Model |  EBC-A40LZKEtech · 2020Read review → |  Electronic load 150 V, 40 A, 300 W2017Read review → |
|---|---|---|
| Voltage, V | 5 | 150 |
| Current, A | 40 | 40 |
| Power, W | 200 | 300 |
| In test, W | 110 | 300 |
| Review conclusion | Recommended | Recommended |
Only in one review: Test current 40 A (EBC-A40L); Temperature rise 65 °C (EBC-A40L); Weight 5400 g (EBC-A40L); Price 140 $ (EBC-A40L).
EBC-A40L: The load works very well and meets its specifications, but has several design shortcomings.
Electronic load 150 V, 40 A, 300 W: In CC mode it dissipates 250–300 W; stable operation in CV mode is around 155 W.
Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.
