/    Measurement database » Power supplies » HCF-36L or Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A
Support the project on Patreon


Comparison · Power supplies

HCF-36L or Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A

Two models side by side: measurements taken by the author in their reviews, and their conclusions. The better value in each row is highlighted.

In brief: Based on review measurements: Test current: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (6.8 A vs. 3); Ripple: Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A (150 mV vs. 300); Efficiency: HCF-36L (84 % vs. 80); Temperature rise: HCF-36L (102 °C vs. 120).

ModelHCF-36LHCF-36L2025Read review →Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 ARaxfly, 5 V 7.2 A2017Read review →
Current, A37.2
Power, W3636
Test current, A36.8
Ripple, mV300150
Efficiency, %8480
Temperature rise, °C102120
Review conclusionNot recommendedNot recommended

Only in one review: Voltage 5 V (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A); In test 34.7 W (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A); Protection 3 A (HCF-36L); Price 11 $ (Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A).

HCF-36L: It handles the load, but generates significant interference and has poor electrical safety; the author advises against it.

Raxfly, 5 V 7.2 A: The charger fell short of its rated current and power and overheated under sustained load.

Figures were taken from the review text and checked against the quoted passages. Measurement conditions differ between reviews, so read the reviews yourself before buying. Prices at the time of review.

Compare two modelsor

Similar comparisons

← All: power supplies